Risk Management Strategy

1. Risk Identification

Risks are classified into 4 main categories: Strategic Risks (SR), Operational Risks (OR), Financial Risks (FR), and Compliance Risks (CR).

Code

Category

Risk

Description

SR1

Strategic

Failure to achieve AACSB accreditation

Unable to complete iSER requirements or rejected during evaluation

SR2

Strategic

Loss of ACQUIN accreditation

Failure to meet standards during periodic review

SR3

Strategic

Limited financial resources

International and private schools attracting students and faculty

SR4

Strategic

QS Stars rating decline

Failure to maintain minimum 4-star QS rating

OR1

Operational

High-quality staff continuity

Unable to recruit/retain internationally qualified faculty

OR2

Operational

Digital transformation failure

Unable to implement digitalization systems

OR3

Operational

Cybersecurity and data risks

Cyberattacks or data leakages affecting students and research

OR4

Operational

Curriculum innovation failure

Unable to maintain curriculum innovation with market requirements, students feedback, and AI targets

OR5

Operational

Student exchange program failure

Unable to achieve 10% student exchange rate by 2030

OR6

Operational

Faculty retention

High turnover of internationally qualified faculty because of competitive pressures

OR7

Operational

AI ethics violations

AI ethical framework violations

OR8

Operational

English proficiency

Failure to achieve 50% of students reaching B2 English level

FR1

Financial

Enrollment revenue decline

Missing enrollment targets due to competition or economic changes

FR2

Financial

Investment budget inefficiency

Insufficient and non-optimized financial resources for strategic projects

CR1

Compliance

Accreditation standard violations

Non-compliance with ACQUIN/AACSB standards

CR2

Compliance

Data privacy violations

Non-compliance with personal data protection regulations

CR3

Compliance

International publication shortfall

Failure to improve international publication ratio (currently 29%) and achieve 50 MNS publications

CR4

Compliance

International student recruitment failure

Inability to increase international student ratio above current 6% level

2. Risk Assessment Matrix

Risk assessment based on 2 criteria: Likelihood (1-5) and Impact (1-5). Risk Score = Likelihood × Impact. HIGH (12-25), MEDIUM (6-11), LOW (1-5).

Code

Risk

Likelihood

Impact

Score

Level

SR1

Failure to achieve AACSB accreditation

3

5

15

HIGH

SR2

Loss of ACQUIN accreditation

2

5

10

MEDIUM

SR3

Limited financial resources

3

4

12

HIGH

SR4

QS Stars rating decline

2

5

10

HIGH

OR1

High-quality staff continuity

2

4

8

MEDIUM

OR2

Digital transformation failure

2

5

10

MEDIUM

OR3

Cybersecurity and data risks

3

4

12

HIGH

OR4

Curriculum innovation failure

3

4

12

HIGH

OR5

Student exchange program failure

2

3

6

MEDIUM

OR6

Faculty retention

4

3

12

HIGH

OR7

AI ethics violations

2

3

6

MEDIUM

OR8

English proficiency

3

2

6

MEDIUM

FR1

Enrollment revenue decline

2

4

8

MEDIUM

FR2

Investment budget inefficiency

2

3

6

MEDIUM

CR1

Accreditation standard violations

2

5

10

MEDIUM

CR2

Data privacy violations

2

5

10

MEDIUM

CR3

International publication inefficiency

4

3

12

HIGH

CR4

International student recruitment failure

3

3

9

MEDIUM

3. Risk Mitigation Strategies

Code

Risk

Mitigation Strategies

Responsible Unit

SR1

Failure to achieve AACSB accreditation

Hire AACSB consultants, train staff, implement AoL system (AACSB)

QA Dept

SR2

Loss of ACQUIN accreditation

Maintain QA system, internal audits, increase internationalization rate and increase research outputs

QA Dept/Intl Office

SR3

Limited financial resources

Diversify revenue sources from provincial consultancy and projects, short-term certificates in ITM and mid-career managners, develop modern and interdisplinary programs

FOM/FONS/FOMC/ITM

SR4

QS Stars rating decline

Enhance student support services (academic writing lab/computer lab) and career counseling. Upgrade classroom, library, physical health center, and research support.

Rectors’ Board/Administrative Office/IT Team

OR1

High-quality staff continuity

Partner with top universities for joint PhD programs; establish Publication Support Center for editing and methodology support for more doctoral students

Rectors’ Board/ FOM/FONS/FOMC

OR2

Digital transformation failure

Hire ERP consultant and experts for process innovation, invest in more robust internet and wifi system, more robust and user-friendly self-developed learning platforms, regular backups, incident response plan

QA Dept, Laws

OR3

Cybersecurity and data risks

Maintain compliance with Decree 13/2023/NĐ-CP and establish Cybersecurity Emergency Team

IT Team

OR4

Curriculum innovation failure

Develop unique interdisciplinary programs (MNS, MBA/MOTE specializations), biennual cirriculum review

Rectors’ Board

OR5

Student exchange program failure

Expand partner network and two-way exhange program by 20 institutions by 2030 and simplify exchange application from HSB to host institutions

Academic Affairs Department

OR6

Faculty retention

Competitive salary, career development plan, more research grants, and performance-based salary increases (10% annually)

HR

OR7

AI ethics violations

Establish AI committee and require AI statement for students’ submissions

Academic Affairs Department/FOM/FONS/FOMC /UPMO/POMO

OR8

English proficiency

English preparation programs (B1/B2); partner with other English Centers to support proficiency.

Academic Affairs Department/UPMO/POMO

FR1

Admissions revenue decline

Design variations in HSB-MBA, MNS and MOTE programs, including full-time MBA, MNS, and MOTE, Executive MBA and MOTE, Weekend MBA and MOTE. Full-time is 24 months and executive is 18 months

 

Develop advanced specializations for interdisplinary masters’ programs, for example, MBA and MOTE in Digital Marketing and E-Commernce, Technology Management (tech company), Healthcare Management, Finance Management (international fianance centers), Sustainable Business and ESG, etc.,

Rectors’ Board/Academic Affairs Department

FR2

Investment budget inefficiency

Optimize costs through digitalization and prioritize strategic projects: collaborative classrooms to encourage students collaboration, research grants amd spaces  between lecturers and students, and students’ resources such as physical health center and students academic support center

Finance and Planning Dept./Academic Affairs Department/UPMO/POMO

CR1

Accreditation standard violations

Conduct regular standards review against ACQUIN/AACSB requirements; establish Ethics Committee

Intl Office/Academic Affairs Department

CR2

Data privacy violations

Data minimization, employee and staff training

IT Team

CR3

International publication inefficiency

Provide conference participation support (max 1000$/faculty/year); expand resources for research such as data and statistical softwares, expand sepcialized research teams (lecturers vs. lecturers, students vs. lecturers); develop research assistant and teaching assistant programs.

Rectors’ Board / FOM/FONS/FOMC/Academic Affairs Department

CR4

International student admissions failure

Develop admissions strategy for Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, African nations; expand scholarship for international students

UPMO, Intl Office, ITM

4. Risk Reporting System

The risk management reporting structure and responsibilities are established at 3 levels:

Level 1: Board of Trustees (Risk Oversight)

  • Approve risk management framework and and risk hresholds
  • Receive quarterly risk reports from different departments
  • Make decisions on high-level risk response measures

Level 2: Risk Management Committee

  • Composition: Heads of key departments
  • Monthly meetings to assess risk status
  • Coordinate risk mitigation across different departments
  • Report to Board of Trustees quarterly

Level 3: Functional Units (Risk Owners)

Risk Category

Lead Unit

Reporting Frequency

Strategic Risks (SR)

Risk Manangement Comittee

Quarterly

Operational Risks (OR)

Administrative Department/HR Department

Monthly

Financial Risks (FR)

Finance and Planning Dept.

Monthly

Compliance Risks (CR)

Legal Dept/Laws

Quarterly

5. Implementation Timeline (2026-2030)

Year

Key Activities

Milestone

2025- 2026

Complete QA system per ACQUIN standards; Achieve QS Stars 4-star rating; Hanoi University of Business and Management ; Digitalize 50% of administrative processes; Implement risk management framework; 90% of academic processes

QS 4★

2027

Submit AACSB Eligibility Application; Digitalize 90% of administrative processes; Integrate AI into 50% of programs; Expand to 25 international partners

AACSB

2028

Complete 50% of iSER requirements; ACQUIN periodic review; 5% students in international exchange

International Exchange 7%

2029

Complete 70% of iSER requirements; 8% students in international exchange; 30 MNS publications on WOS/Scopus; Host International MNS Forum

iSER 70%

(AACSB)

2030

Achieve Top 100 Business Schools in Asia; 10% students in international exchange; 80% programs with AI integration; 30 active partners; 50 MNS publications

TOP 100 ASIA

Related Posts